![]() ![]() ![]() In the second lawsuit, we filed three IPR petitions and convinced the District Court to stay the lawsuit before an IPR institution decision was made. In all, we disposed of 25 of the 35 asserted patent claims before summary judgment. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated all of the instituted claims, resulting in claimant dismissing the heart of its case. We initiated a multi-faceted attack involving two challenges under Section 101 and filing three IPR petitions. The first lawsuit involved patent infringement claims of three unrelated patents involving infusion pump technology. We were retained by a large medical technology company to defend it in three patent infringement lawsuits.After receiving our motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on Section 101, the patent owner chose to dismiss the lawsuit voluntarily. The asserted patent was directed to remote alert notification systems for assisted living facilities. We defended a patent infringement lawsuit filed in the Central District of California.We first moved to dismiss under Section 101, then contacted the SEC to encourage the agency to intervene in the lawsuit and, finally, filed Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions. According to the patent owner, people who file with the SEC in the required format are infringing its patents. The patent owner claimed that its patents cover the use of XBRL, an international standard for reporting financial information. An NPE sued the client for patent infringement. We obtained dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a non-practicing entity (NPE) in the District of Delaware against our client who makes software that public companies use to file with the SEC.Our litigators have been recognized nationally as leaders in the field, garnering honors from IP Law Experts, IAM Patent 1000, World Trademark Review 1000, Chambers USA, Best Lawyers®, and Minnesota Super Lawyers. In addition to this suite of legal services, our team is trained in legal project management and offers predictable budgeting and custom communication plans to meet each of our client’s preferences. ![]() If knockoff products appear on the market, we help stop infringers and protect you in and out of court. Our attorneys develop prevention strategies to help you protect your intellectual property. Anti-Counterfeiting and Anti-Piracy Litigation.Our group’s copyright litigation experience spans publishing, architecture, arts & entertainment, software and more. Our intellectual property litigators work on cases involving technological secrets, formulas and manufacturing and other critical business information. Our attorneys have successfully litigated sizeable licensing disputes involving critical intellectual property assets. We handle matters before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, opposing or seeking to cancel the registration of trademarks confusingly similar to those of our clients and defending against similar claims. Our attorneys have substantial experience in trademark, trade dress, false advertising and domain name disputes. We are known for bringing complex concepts to life for judges and juries. Our attorneys handle patent infringement litigation in every industry and business sector. Our IP Litigation Group provides the following range of services: We handle disputes across the country−to date we have litigated in 36 states and the District of Columbia. From dispute advice to complex litigation, our team understands our clients’ business objectives and legal issues. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |